Hacked emails prove Climate scientists manipulating global warming data

So I have been harping on about this for almost as long as I have had a blog, but now it has been exposed that there has been clear manipulation of the Data presented to support the man made global warming climate change argument.

Climate change is (obviously!!) as natural to this planet as day and night. The period we are in is even called an interglacial period for goodness sake. The earth gets very cold and enters an ice age, and then warms up again, and then gets cold again, and then gets warm again, etc. etc. Nothing strange here, it has been happening for eons. Recent times included, such as the medieval warming period which was followed by the Little Ice Age in around 1650. I posted it before a couple of years ago, but in light of this scandal it bears re-posting for some perspective:


To think that we can control the temperature of this enormous planet is incredibly arrogant. There are much larger forces at work here, such as the Milankovitch cycles, precession of the equinoxes, axial tilt and Precession, sun spot cycles and most likely a load of other forces we know nothing about as we all fly through space as the Sun orbits around the galaxy. Will taxing people change any of that??? Of course it wont!

The whole thing has been about control of developing nations and taxation since day one. It is also a distraction from the real issues that we could do something about like resource depletion and pollution.

Anyway, back to the story:

Recently, Russian hackers published over 160mb of scientific emails and source code taken from the primary ‘climate research unit’ — the University of East Anglia, which is the center of UN/IPCC-promoted global warming alarmism. What the emails and data prove is shocking, and may represent the greatest scandal in the history of science.

In the emails, these UN-funded scientists talk about deleting data under FOIA request, faking data for journals such as Nature, conspiring to keep opposing science out of peer-reviewed journals (which they controlled the editorial boards), using “tricks” to “hide the [cooling period]” etc.

A picture emerges of big science funded to the tune of billions of dollars for the purposes of an underlying international political agenda. The degree of collusion between big media, the UN, and corrupted scientists involved in frank criminal activity is deeply disturbing. As I have detailed before, the purpose here is a political one.

Continued at Zero hedge here..

You can search through the emails here if you like. More write ups about it here, and here, and at the telegraph here.


  1. L... 7 years ago

    Yea deeply worrying…the extent to which it has been hijacked and the involvement of some previously highly “credible” and highly placed individuals is incredible.
    More info here:

  2. koskesh 7 years ago

    frankly I disagree with the latest findings, as I am from this school of thought: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-qN6TCY85c

  3. Author
    ptsp 7 years ago

    Haha, dude I worry about you. Not sure that even counts as a school of thought. Nice song/vid though.

  4. koskesh 7 years ago

    don’t hate mini…the findings are legit…from the IDS, Institute of The Dirty Souff

  5. Author
    ptsp 7 years ago

    Dont platonify.

  6. Trey 7 years ago

    Logic and an education: I have been preaching this for an eternity…
    Thanks for your post. Good stuff!

  7. Author
    ptsp 7 years ago

    In that case, Thank you too!

  8. Author
    ptsp 7 years ago

    What happened to global warming?

    By Paul Hudson
    Climate correspondent, BBC News

    Average temperatures have not increased for over a decade

    This headline may come as a bit of a surprise, so too might that fact that the warmest year recorded globally was not in 2008 or 2007, but in 1998.

    But it is true. For the last 11 years we have not observed any increase in global temperatures.


Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *